CommoVision

See the future in real time

Antrim County, Michigan

Antrim County, Michigan produced 5 Mbbl (thousand barrels) of oil and 11.3 Bcf of natural gas in 2025. 1,457 producing wells tracked, 12 months to Aug 2026.

  • Third-largest gas-producing county in Michigan, 2025.
  • 18.5% of the natural gas produced in Michigan, 2025.
  • Natural gas production fell 5% in 2025 from 2024.
Well map of Antrim County, Michigan. The full map is further down this page.

Production

Antrim County, Michigan natural gas production (MMcf/d, grouped by when each well first produced)
  • filling in (est. · unconfirmed) . Hatching marks our estimate of the volume still to be filed. That estimate draws on our own production forecast. This estimate is published unconfirmed. It updates as filings arrive
  • estimated . Hatching marks our estimate. In the most recent months that is volume still to be filed. Past the divider it is our estimate of each whole month, built on any filings already in. Beyond the last filings it is our forecast.
Antrim County, Michigan natural gas production: million cubic feet per day, by first-production vintage filed in full 204060 MMcf/d 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026 Nov 2016: 47.6 MMcf/d total Dec 2016: 46.9 MMcf/d total Jan 2017: 46.9 MMcf/d total Feb 2017: 47.1 MMcf/d total Mar 2017: 46.5 MMcf/d total Apr 2017: 45.6 MMcf/d total May 2017: 45.7 MMcf/d total Jun 2017: 45.3 MMcf/d total Jul 2017: 46.3 MMcf/d total Aug 2017: 46.1 MMcf/d total Sep 2017: 45.5 MMcf/d total Oct 2017: 46.1 MMcf/d total Nov 2017: 45.7 MMcf/d total Dec 2017: 45.3 MMcf/d total Jan 2018: 44.7 MMcf/d total Feb 2018: 44.6 MMcf/d total Mar 2018: 43.6 MMcf/d total Apr 2018: 43.4 MMcf/d total May 2018: 43 MMcf/d total Jun 2018: 43.8 MMcf/d total Jul 2018: 43.5 MMcf/d total Aug 2018: 44.3 MMcf/d total Sep 2018: 43.7 MMcf/d total Oct 2018: 44.4 MMcf/d total Nov 2018: 43.8 MMcf/d total Dec 2018: 43.3 MMcf/d total Jan 2019: 42.2 MMcf/d total Feb 2019: 41.7 MMcf/d total Mar 2019: 41 MMcf/d total Apr 2019: 41 MMcf/d total May 2019: 41.6 MMcf/d total Jun 2019: 42.1 MMcf/d total Jul 2019: 42.2 MMcf/d total Aug 2019: 42.1 MMcf/d total Sep 2019: 41.6 MMcf/d total Oct 2019: 40.6 MMcf/d total Nov 2019: 40.6 MMcf/d total Dec 2019: 40.1 MMcf/d total Jan 2020: 39.4 MMcf/d total Feb 2020: 38.7 MMcf/d total Mar 2020: 38.6 MMcf/d total Apr 2020: 38.4 MMcf/d total May 2020: 39 MMcf/d total Jun 2020: 39.3 MMcf/d total Jul 2020: 39.3 MMcf/d total Aug 2020: 39 MMcf/d total Sep 2020: 39.4 MMcf/d total Oct 2020: 39.3 MMcf/d total Nov 2020: 39 MMcf/d total Dec 2020: 38.6 MMcf/d total Jan 2021: 37.6 MMcf/d total Feb 2021: 37.4 MMcf/d total Mar 2021: 37 MMcf/d total Apr 2021: 38.9 MMcf/d total May 2021: 37.5 MMcf/d total Jun 2021: 35.2 MMcf/d total Jul 2021: 37.7 MMcf/d total Aug 2021: 40 MMcf/d total Sep 2021: 37.5 MMcf/d total Oct 2021: 37.5 MMcf/d total Nov 2021: 37.1 MMcf/d total Dec 2021: 36.6 MMcf/d total Jan 2022: 35.6 MMcf/d total Feb 2022: 35.3 MMcf/d total Mar 2022: 35.2 MMcf/d total Apr 2022: 35.6 MMcf/d total May 2022: 35.3 MMcf/d total Jun 2022: 35.7 MMcf/d total Jul 2022: 35.9 MMcf/d total Aug 2022: 36 MMcf/d total Sep 2022: 36 MMcf/d total Oct 2022: 35.7 MMcf/d total Nov 2022: 35.5 MMcf/d total Dec 2022: 34.9 MMcf/d total Jan 2023: 35.8 MMcf/d total Feb 2023: 34.3 MMcf/d total Mar 2023: 34.2 MMcf/d total Apr 2023: 34.3 MMcf/d total May 2023: 34.3 MMcf/d total Jun 2023: 34.6 MMcf/d total Jul 2023: 34.6 MMcf/d total Aug 2023: 34.4 MMcf/d total Sep 2023: 34.4 MMcf/d total Oct 2023: 34.3 MMcf/d total Nov 2023: 34 MMcf/d total Dec 2023: 33.6 MMcf/d total Jan 2024: 32.5 MMcf/d total Feb 2024: 31.9 MMcf/d total Mar 2024: 32.6 MMcf/d total Apr 2024: 32.2 MMcf/d total May 2024: 32.2 MMcf/d total Jun 2024: 32.6 MMcf/d total Jul 2024: 32.8 MMcf/d total Aug 2024: 32.5 MMcf/d total Sep 2024: 32.8 MMcf/d total Oct 2024: 32.6 MMcf/d total Nov 2024: 32.7 MMcf/d total Dec 2024: 31.7 MMcf/d total Jan 2025: 31.1 MMcf/d total Feb 2025: 31.4 MMcf/d total Mar 2025: 30.7 MMcf/d total Apr 2025: 30.4 MMcf/d total May 2025: 30.9 MMcf/d total Jun 2025: 31.2 MMcf/d total Jul 2025: 30.7 MMcf/d total Aug 2025: 31.3 MMcf/d total Sep 2025: 30.9 MMcf/d total Oct 2025: 31 MMcf/d total Nov 2025: 30.5 MMcf/d total Dec 2025: 30.2 MMcf/d total Jan 2026: 29.9 MMcf/d total Feb 2026: 29.6 MMcf/d total Mar 2026: 29.5 MMcf/d total Apr 2026: 29.4 MMcf/d total May 2026: 29.7 MMcf/d total Jun 2026: 29.8 MMcf/d total Jul 2026: 30.1 MMcf/d total Aug 2026: 29.9 MMcf/d total Sep 2026: ≈30.3 MMcf/d total (14% arrived, remainder estimated) Oct 2026: ≈30.3 MMcf/d total (<1% arrived, remainder estimated)

In this view, hatching marks our estimate, and in the most recent months that is volume still to be filed. Past the divider, the chart continues only the bands it has drawn. Each band continues as our estimate, from any filings already in and then from our forecast, built by summing our per-well forecasts. The method behind each well is recorded with the forecast. The forward months cover existing wells only. How our methods work

All from what the source published. All held at well grain.

How the volume breaks down
  • 12.6% Reported by the official source by well
  • 87.4% Reported by the official source as a lease total, split across the lease's wells. The regional total shown is the reported number, to rounding.

Every cubic foot through August 2026 starts from what the official source published for those months. Measured over January 1982 to August 2026.

Antrim County, Michigan oil production (bbl/d, grouped by when each well first produced)
As reported. Reported data only.
Antrim County, Michigan oil production: barrels per day, by first-production vintage today 204060 bbl/d 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026 Sep 2016: 41.2 bbl/d total Oct 2016: 37.8 bbl/d total Nov 2016: 34 bbl/d total Dec 2016: 34.2 bbl/d total Jan 2017: 39.7 bbl/d total Feb 2017: 36.2 bbl/d total Mar 2017: 35.6 bbl/d total Apr 2017: 36.7 bbl/d total May 2017: 33.9 bbl/d total Jun 2017: 31.2 bbl/d total Jul 2017: 37.5 bbl/d total Aug 2017: 36.6 bbl/d total Sep 2017: 44.7 bbl/d total Oct 2017: 24.3 bbl/d total Nov 2017: 36.1 bbl/d total Dec 2017: 32 bbl/d total Jan 2018: 30.7 bbl/d total Feb 2018: 30.1 bbl/d total Mar 2018: 30.8 bbl/d total Apr 2018: 29.2 bbl/d total May 2018: 28.5 bbl/d total Jun 2018: 26 bbl/d total Jul 2018: 27.1 bbl/d total Aug 2018: 21.1 bbl/d total Sep 2018: 26.5 bbl/d total Oct 2018: 27.8 bbl/d total Nov 2018: 23.4 bbl/d total Dec 2018: 24.4 bbl/d total Jan 2019: 22.4 bbl/d total Feb 2019: 22.1 bbl/d total Mar 2019: 20 bbl/d total Apr 2019: 14.2 bbl/d total May 2019: 31.2 bbl/d total Jun 2019: 32 bbl/d total Jul 2019: 28.2 bbl/d total Aug 2019: 26.4 bbl/d total Sep 2019: 23.4 bbl/d total Oct 2019: 20.4 bbl/d total Nov 2019: 20.3 bbl/d total Dec 2019: 18.6 bbl/d total Jan 2020: 17.7 bbl/d total Feb 2020: 13.2 bbl/d total Mar 2020: 13.3 bbl/d total Apr 2020: 7.63 bbl/d total May 2020: 7.48 bbl/d total Jun 2020: 6.77 bbl/d total Jul 2020: 8.32 bbl/d total Aug 2020: 6.68 bbl/d total Sep 2020: 9.43 bbl/d total Oct 2020: 12.5 bbl/d total Nov 2020: 9.67 bbl/d total Dec 2020: 4.74 bbl/d total Jan 2021: 8.77 bbl/d total Feb 2021: 32.5 bbl/d total Mar 2021: 14.3 bbl/d total Apr 2021: 6.13 bbl/d total May 2021: 4.48 bbl/d total Jun 2021: 4.9 bbl/d total Jul 2021: 4.9 bbl/d total Aug 2021: 4.39 bbl/d total Sep 2021: 10.7 bbl/d total Oct 2021: 8.97 bbl/d total Nov 2021: 4.7 bbl/d total Dec 2021: 4.16 bbl/d total Jan 2022: 4.42 bbl/d total Feb 2022: 4.71 bbl/d total Mar 2022: 8.07 bbl/d total Apr 2022: 13.8 bbl/d total May 2022: 14.1 bbl/d total Jun 2022: 21.4 bbl/d total Jul 2022: 17.4 bbl/d total Aug 2022: 15.8 bbl/d total Sep 2022: 14.4 bbl/d total Oct 2022: 10.3 bbl/d total Nov 2022: 13.9 bbl/d total Dec 2022: 17.1 bbl/d total Jan 2023: 15.5 bbl/d total Feb 2023: 17 bbl/d total Mar 2023: 16 bbl/d total Apr 2023: 20.5 bbl/d total May 2023: 19.3 bbl/d total Jun 2023: 17.2 bbl/d total Jul 2023: 15.1 bbl/d total Aug 2023: 15.4 bbl/d total Sep 2023: 14.6 bbl/d total Oct 2023: 20.8 bbl/d total Nov 2023: 12.8 bbl/d total Dec 2023: 12.8 bbl/d total Jan 2024: 9.68 bbl/d total Feb 2024: 16.5 bbl/d total Mar 2024: 12.6 bbl/d total Apr 2024: 13.9 bbl/d total May 2024: 12.4 bbl/d total Jun 2024: 10.1 bbl/d total Jul 2024: 9.74 bbl/d total Aug 2024: 10.9 bbl/d total Sep 2024: 16.1 bbl/d total Oct 2024: 8.36 bbl/d total Nov 2024: 15.1 bbl/d total Dec 2024: 9.36 bbl/d total Jan 2025: 15.5 bbl/d total Feb 2025: 13.8 bbl/d total Mar 2025: 15.5 bbl/d total Apr 2025: 15 bbl/d total May 2025: 13.7 bbl/d total Jun 2025: 8.27 bbl/d total Jul 2025: 11.5 bbl/d total Aug 2025: 11.8 bbl/d total Sep 2025: 14.1 bbl/d total Oct 2025: 13.1 bbl/d total Nov 2025: 15.4 bbl/d total Dec 2025: 17.6 bbl/d total Jan 2026: 17.1 bbl/d total Feb 2026: 16 bbl/d total Mar 2026: 17 bbl/d total Apr 2026: 15.6 bbl/d total May 2026: 15.2 bbl/d total Jun 2026: 14.2 bbl/d total Jul 2026: 11.6 bbl/d total Aug 2026: 0 bbl/d total

Still arriving: Sep 2026 14% filed.

All from what the source published. All held at well grain.

How the volume breaks down
  • 86.5% Reported by the official source by well
  • 13.5% Reported by the official source as a lease total, split across the lease's wells. The regional total shown is the reported number, to rounding.

Every barrel through August 2026 starts from what the official source published for those months. Measured over January 1982 to August 2026.

The bands group wells by when they first produced.

About this chart

The stack shows what is holding today's rate up and how much of it is new drilling. In the reported months the bands draw the filings already in. The months still filling in are marked.

Annual table (full history)

best estimate incl. allocated

YearOil (MMbbl)Gas produced (Bcf)
2025<0.111
2024<0.112
2023<0.113
2022<0.113
2021<0.114
2020<0.114
2019<0.115
2018<0.116
2017<0.117
2016<0.118
2015<0.118
2014<0.119
2013<0.120
2012<0.122
2011<0.123
2010<0.125
2009<0.125
2008<0.125
2007<0.124
2006<0.123
2005<0.123
2004<0.123
2003<0.122
2002<0.121
2001<0.120
2000<0.118
1999<0.117
1998<0.118
1997<0.118
1996<0.110
1995<0.13
1994<0.14
1993<0.13
1992<0.11
1991<0.11
19900.11
19890.1<1
19880.1<1
19870.1<1
19860.1<1
19850.1<1
19840.1<1
19830.1<1
19820.1<1

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Monthly table (last 24 months)
MonthOil (Mbbl)Gas produced (MMcf)
2026-080.0927
2026-070.4934
2026-060.4893
2026-050.5922
2026-040.5881
2026-030.5913
2026-020.4830
2026-010.5926
2025-120.5936
2025-110.5915
2025-100.4960
2025-090.4926
2025-080.4970
2025-070.4950
2025-060.2935
2025-050.4958
2025-040.5913
2025-030.5952
2025-020.4879
2025-010.5965
2024-120.3983
2024-110.5981
2024-100.31,010
2024-090.5983

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Source: CommoVision · Antrim County, Michigan, data through September 2026.

Well map

A map of 1,848 well locations in Antrim County, Michigan for which CommoVision holds a published surface coordinate, each drawn where it is and colored by its primary product (green for oil, red for natural gas, gray where undetermined; a spot shared by more than one product shows the one with the most wells there), on a ground of land and water over faint county outlines and place names for orientation, with the drilled wellbore path traced for 29 wells, with a small inset map locating this frame in Michigan.
  • Oil 11
  • Natural gas 1,682
  • Undetermined 155
1,848 well locations in Antrim County, Michigan, colored by primary product. The drilled path is traced for 29 wells from the directional surveys we hold.
About this map

Undetermined means not enough signal to settle it. Producing wells are the ones that reported oil or gas in the 12 months to Aug 2026.

15.2 bbl/d May 2026 oil production +10.6% vs May last year
29.9 MMcf/d Aug 2026 gas production -4.4% vs Aug last year best estimate incl. allocated
13.8 bbl/d 2025 oil production
30.8 MMcf/d 2025 gas production best estimate incl. allocated
1,457 wells Producing wells tracked 12 months to Aug 2026
28.9 MMcf/d Existing wells, Oct 2027 forecast Our forecast for existing wells.

Type curves

Antrim County, Michigan natural gas type curves (Mcf/d per well, log scale, against months on production; cohorts 2010–2014)
Antrim County, Michigan natural gas type curves: average thousand cubic feet per day per well on a log scale against months on production 2010-2014: 51 wells in curve; starts at 25.1 Mcf/d per well, 0.1 Bcf cumulative through month 164 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 224, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends102040Mcf/d24487296120144168192216240Months on production

best estimate incl. allocated

Average production per well, for wells grouped by when they first produced.

How these curves are built

Average daily production per well, for wells grouped by when they first produced. Includes every well of the cohort that is old enough at each month. Wells that are shut in or have stopped producing count as zero, so the average reflects the full cohort, not just survivors. Rates are calendar-day (volume ÷ days in month). The cumulative axis accumulates those same monthly averages at the average month length. Months not yet fully reported are excluded. The 2010-2014 curve draws those years as one group. The chart opens on average daily rate against months on production, the rate on a log scale. The view control switches to rate against cumulative production per well, on the same log rate scale, or to cumulative production per well against months on production, on a linear scale. Every view draws the same cohorts from the same production history. Each cohort is solid through the last month all the wells in its curve sit inside fully reported data. Past it the dashed curve carries the same wells forward, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends, for up to five years. A dashed curve runs as far as at least nine in ten of its wells are accounted for. A well that is old enough but shut in still counts, as zero. The measured months are what these wells reported. In the forward months each well counts its own reported figure for each month it has one, our forecast for each month it has only that, and zero for the rest. The forward average counts every well in the curve. The drawn forecast runs up to five years past the measured months. Line thickness tracks the size of each cohort. 8 wells are counted here but not shown on the age axis: they started producing in 1984 or earlier, too close to the start of our records for their region to verify their true age.

Cohort summary table
First produced Wells in curve Peak gas (Mcf/d per well) Month-12 gas (Mcf/d per well) Cum gas in series (Bcf per well) Months in series Wells old enough at last month in series Forecast months drawn
2010-2014 51 34.6 32.4 0.1 164 100% 60

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Source: CommoVision · Antrim County, Michigan type curves, per-well production by first-production cohort.

Top operators in Antrim County, Michigan, 2025 best estimate incl. allocated

  1. Riverside Energy Michigan LLC 84.2%
  2. Jordan Development Co LLC 6.7%
  3. V C P Michigan, LLC 3.9%
  4. Nuenergy LLC 3.1%
  5. Lambda Energy Resources LLC 1.2%
  6. Core Antrim Company LLC 0.4%
  7. Without a named operator 0.5%
Top operators in Antrim County, Michigan, 2025: full table
OperatorOil (Mbbl/d, 2025)Gas produced (MMcf/d, 2025)Share of output
Riverside Energy Michigan LLC 0.026.184.2%
Jordan Development Co LLC 0.02.16.7%
V C P Michigan, LLC 0.01.23.9%
Nuenergy LLC 0.01.03.1%
Lambda Energy Resources LLC 0.00.21.2%
Core Antrim Company LLC (August to December) 0.00.30.4%
Without a named operator 0.00.20.5%

Mbbl/d = thousand barrels per day · MMcf/d = million cubic feet per day (units).

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Formations

One cross-section across Antrim County, in the Michigan Basin.

Antrim County, Michigan
-2,000-1,500-1,000-5000500ft TVDSSEllsworthAntrimTraverse FormationBell ShaleDundeeDetroit River0102030NSmiles along the line · dipping 41 ft/mi toward S (174°) · pale ribbon shows how certain each depth is
N1,662 producing wells (thinned)

6 formations along a 36-mile line, north to south.

Every depth drawn here is our own estimate, built from the curated formation tops of Michigan wells across the basin. The pale ribbon along each boundary shows how certain that depth is. Where the ribbon is wider, the depth is less certain.

How these sections are built

The section follows one straight line across the county, and the map beside it shows where that line runs.

West is on the left.

The depth of each formation along the line is estimated from the depths at which Michigan wells across the basin met that formation, as recorded in the official source's per-well formation-top records.

A formation is drawn where enough wells along the line place it and where it stands clear of the formation above or below.

What we cover here

Each row names the grain a region’s production is held at. Where a source publishes at a coarser grain, the page says so.

DataGrainSinceBenchmark
Michigan production well 1980-08 ~100% of EIA

Benchmark cells compare our series with the EIA’s published estimates.

About the EIA comparison

The two are produced differently: the EIA estimates from a survey of the largest operators and a model built to anticipate late filings, while the series compared here are rebuilt from the source’s own records as they arrive. Recent months can differ without either being wrong; the methodology page explains both methods.

Coverage rows for Antrim County, Michigan are regenerated at every build from the same catalog of sources the data is built from.

What the data shows

  • Antrim County, Michigan produced 5 Mbbl (thousand barrels) of oil and 11.3 Bcf of natural gas in 2025.
  • Antrim County, Michigan gas production peaked in 2009 at 25.3 Bcf; 2025 output of 11.3 Bcf ran at 44% of that peak.
  • 1,457 producing wells tracked, 12 months to Aug 2026.

Start a free trial

Watch supply move as soon as its sources publish, with forecasts on 1.1+ million producing wells. The portal is open, with a real API and MCP access for AI tools.

What the trial includes

Data use is subject to our Terms of Service.