CommoVision

See the future in real time

Otsego County, Michigan

Otsego County, Michigan produced 451 Mbbl (thousand barrels) of oil and 13.0 Bcf of natural gas in 2025. 2,827 producing wells tracked, 12 months to Jun 2026.

  • Second-largest gas-producing county in Michigan, 2025.
  • 21.4% of the natural gas produced in Michigan, 2025.
  • Natural gas production fell 8% in 2025 from 2024.
Well map of Otsego County, Michigan. The full map is further down this page.

Production

Otsego County, Michigan natural gas production (MMcf/d, grouped by when each well first produced)
  • filling in (est. · missed) . Hatching marks our estimate of the volume still to be filed. That estimate draws on our own production forecast. A check on the forecast behind this estimate measured a miss. It updates as filings arrive
  • estimated . Hatching marks our estimate. In the most recent months that is volume still to be filed. Past the divider it is our estimate of each whole month, built on any filings already in. Beyond the last filings it is our forecast.
Otsego County, Michigan natural gas production: million cubic feet per day, by first-production vintage filed in full 20406080 MMcf/d 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026 Nov 2016: 65.8 MMcf/d total Dec 2016: 64.2 MMcf/d total Jan 2017: 63.1 MMcf/d total Feb 2017: 63.5 MMcf/d total Mar 2017: 62.5 MMcf/d total Apr 2017: 63 MMcf/d total May 2017: 63.9 MMcf/d total Jun 2017: 63.9 MMcf/d total Jul 2017: 63.4 MMcf/d total Aug 2017: 63.8 MMcf/d total Sep 2017: 63.2 MMcf/d total Oct 2017: 63.6 MMcf/d total Nov 2017: 62.1 MMcf/d total Dec 2017: 58.5 MMcf/d total Jan 2018: 57.8 MMcf/d total Feb 2018: 57.5 MMcf/d total Mar 2018: 57.7 MMcf/d total Apr 2018: 57.5 MMcf/d total May 2018: 58.2 MMcf/d total Jun 2018: 60.6 MMcf/d total Jul 2018: 59.3 MMcf/d total Aug 2018: 59.2 MMcf/d total Sep 2018: 58.8 MMcf/d total Oct 2018: 58.4 MMcf/d total Nov 2018: 58 MMcf/d total Dec 2018: 56.6 MMcf/d total Jan 2019: 53.2 MMcf/d total Feb 2019: 53.6 MMcf/d total Mar 2019: 52.4 MMcf/d total Apr 2019: 53.7 MMcf/d total May 2019: 54.8 MMcf/d total Jun 2019: 55.3 MMcf/d total Jul 2019: 55.4 MMcf/d total Aug 2019: 53.4 MMcf/d total Sep 2019: 52.6 MMcf/d total Oct 2019: 52.2 MMcf/d total Nov 2019: 51.4 MMcf/d total Dec 2019: 49.5 MMcf/d total Jan 2020: 45.1 MMcf/d total Feb 2020: 46.4 MMcf/d total Mar 2020: 46.1 MMcf/d total Apr 2020: 45.9 MMcf/d total May 2020: 45.8 MMcf/d total Jun 2020: 46.5 MMcf/d total Jul 2020: 45.8 MMcf/d total Aug 2020: 47.5 MMcf/d total Sep 2020: 50.6 MMcf/d total Oct 2020: 48.4 MMcf/d total Nov 2020: 48.5 MMcf/d total Dec 2020: 46.7 MMcf/d total Jan 2021: 46 MMcf/d total Feb 2021: 44.1 MMcf/d total Mar 2021: 45 MMcf/d total Apr 2021: 46.9 MMcf/d total May 2021: 45.8 MMcf/d total Jun 2021: 45.7 MMcf/d total Jul 2021: 46.2 MMcf/d total Aug 2021: 46.4 MMcf/d total Sep 2021: 46.3 MMcf/d total Oct 2021: 46.6 MMcf/d total Nov 2021: 46.2 MMcf/d total Dec 2021: 44.7 MMcf/d total Jan 2022: 42.3 MMcf/d total Feb 2022: 41.5 MMcf/d total Mar 2022: 41.1 MMcf/d total Apr 2022: 42.4 MMcf/d total May 2022: 43.5 MMcf/d total Jun 2022: 43.7 MMcf/d total Jul 2022: 43.6 MMcf/d total Aug 2022: 43.9 MMcf/d total Sep 2022: 43.5 MMcf/d total Oct 2022: 44.1 MMcf/d total Nov 2022: 43.6 MMcf/d total Dec 2022: 41.8 MMcf/d total Jan 2023: 42.4 MMcf/d total Feb 2023: 41.1 MMcf/d total Mar 2023: 41.5 MMcf/d total Apr 2023: 41.8 MMcf/d total May 2023: 42 MMcf/d total Jun 2023: 42.4 MMcf/d total Jul 2023: 42.7 MMcf/d total Aug 2023: 42.4 MMcf/d total Sep 2023: 42 MMcf/d total Oct 2023: 41.8 MMcf/d total Nov 2023: 40.8 MMcf/d total Dec 2023: 40.2 MMcf/d total Jan 2024: 38.6 MMcf/d total Feb 2024: 39.4 MMcf/d total Mar 2024: 38.5 MMcf/d total Apr 2024: 38.5 MMcf/d total May 2024: 39.1 MMcf/d total Jun 2024: 39.1 MMcf/d total Jul 2024: 39 MMcf/d total Aug 2024: 39 MMcf/d total Sep 2024: 38.4 MMcf/d total Oct 2024: 38.2 MMcf/d total Nov 2024: 37.6 MMcf/d total Dec 2024: 36.4 MMcf/d total Jan 2025: 35.6 MMcf/d total Feb 2025: 35.4 MMcf/d total Mar 2025: 34.8 MMcf/d total Apr 2025: 34.4 MMcf/d total May 2025: 36.4 MMcf/d total Jun 2025: 36 MMcf/d total Jul 2025: 35.9 MMcf/d total Aug 2025: 36.9 MMcf/d total Sep 2025: 36.7 MMcf/d total Oct 2025: 34.4 MMcf/d total Nov 2025: 36.3 MMcf/d total Dec 2025: 34 MMcf/d total Jan 2026: 32.6 MMcf/d total Feb 2026: 33.3 MMcf/d total Mar 2026: 32.8 MMcf/d total Apr 2026: 32.5 MMcf/d total May 2026: 32.9 MMcf/d total Jun 2026: 32.7 MMcf/d total Jul 2026: ≈33.2 MMcf/d total (29% arrived, remainder estimated) Aug 2026: ≈32.6 MMcf/d total (<1% arrived, remainder estimated) Sep 2026: ≈32.6 MMcf/d total (<1% arrived, remainder estimated) Oct 2026: ≈32.5 MMcf/d total (<1% arrived, remainder estimated)

In this view, hatching marks our estimate, and in the most recent months that is volume still to be filed. Past the divider, the chart continues only the bands it has drawn. Each band continues as our estimate, from any filings already in and then from our forecast, built by summing our per-well forecasts. The method behind each well is recorded with the forecast. The forward months cover existing wells only. How our methods work

All from what the source published. All held at well grain.

How the volume breaks down
  • 22.3% Reported by the official source by well
  • 77.7% Reported by the official source as a lease total, split across the lease's wells. The regional total shown is the reported number, to rounding.
  • under 0.01% Reported by the official source for a longer period, spread across its months. The period total is the reported number.

Every cubic foot through June 2026 starts from what the official source published for those months. Measured over January 1982 to June 2026.

Otsego County, Michigan oil production (bbl/d, grouped by when each well first produced)
  • filling in (est. · missed) . Hatching marks our estimate of the volume still to be filed. That estimate draws on our own production forecast. A check on the forecast behind this estimate measured a miss. It updates as filings arrive
Otsego County, Michigan oil production: barrels per day, by first-production vintage filed in full today 1,0002,0003,000 bbl/d 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026 Aug 2016: 1,114 bbl/d total Sep 2016: 1,097 bbl/d total Oct 2016: 1,078 bbl/d total Nov 2016: 1,099 bbl/d total Dec 2016: 1,156 bbl/d total Jan 2017: 1,123 bbl/d total Feb 2017: 1,287 bbl/d total Mar 2017: 1,267 bbl/d total Apr 2017: 1,281 bbl/d total May 2017: 1,306 bbl/d total Jun 2017: 1,256 bbl/d total Jul 2017: 1,518 bbl/d total Aug 2017: 1,539 bbl/d total Sep 2017: 1,481 bbl/d total Oct 2017: 1,430 bbl/d total Nov 2017: 1,389 bbl/d total Dec 2017: 1,418 bbl/d total Jan 2018: 1,406 bbl/d total Feb 2018: 1,375 bbl/d total Mar 2018: 1,393 bbl/d total Apr 2018: 1,242 bbl/d total May 2018: 1,210 bbl/d total Jun 2018: 1,300 bbl/d total Jul 2018: 1,201 bbl/d total Aug 2018: 1,120 bbl/d total Sep 2018: 1,103 bbl/d total Oct 2018: 1,205 bbl/d total Nov 2018: 1,170 bbl/d total Dec 2018: 1,185 bbl/d total Jan 2019: 1,124 bbl/d total Feb 2019: 1,195 bbl/d total Mar 2019: 1,130 bbl/d total Apr 2019: 1,130 bbl/d total May 2019: 1,145 bbl/d total Jun 2019: 1,024 bbl/d total Jul 2019: 1,078 bbl/d total Aug 2019: 978 bbl/d total Sep 2019: 1,135 bbl/d total Oct 2019: 1,202 bbl/d total Nov 2019: 1,169 bbl/d total Dec 2019: 1,175 bbl/d total Jan 2020: 1,148 bbl/d total Feb 2020: 1,114 bbl/d total Mar 2020: 1,136 bbl/d total Apr 2020: 941 bbl/d total May 2020: 561 bbl/d total Jun 2020: 777 bbl/d total Jul 2020: 1,003 bbl/d total Aug 2020: 1,209 bbl/d total Sep 2020: 1,185 bbl/d total Oct 2020: 1,036 bbl/d total Nov 2020: 1,036 bbl/d total Dec 2020: 1,169 bbl/d total Jan 2021: 1,592 bbl/d total Feb 2021: 1,682 bbl/d total Mar 2021: 1,787 bbl/d total Apr 2021: 1,627 bbl/d total May 2021: 1,623 bbl/d total Jun 2021: 1,564 bbl/d total Jul 2021: 1,818 bbl/d total Aug 2021: 1,941 bbl/d total Sep 2021: 1,909 bbl/d total Oct 2021: 1,891 bbl/d total Nov 2021: 1,857 bbl/d total Dec 2021: 1,859 bbl/d total Jan 2022: 1,880 bbl/d total Feb 2022: 2,009 bbl/d total Mar 2022: 1,908 bbl/d total Apr 2022: 1,837 bbl/d total May 2022: 1,886 bbl/d total Jun 2022: 1,819 bbl/d total Jul 2022: 1,808 bbl/d total Aug 2022: 1,822 bbl/d total Sep 2022: 1,937 bbl/d total Oct 2022: 1,947 bbl/d total Nov 2022: 1,791 bbl/d total Dec 2022: 1,675 bbl/d total Jan 2023: 1,606 bbl/d total Feb 2023: 1,672 bbl/d total Mar 2023: 1,584 bbl/d total Apr 2023: 1,498 bbl/d total May 2023: 1,621 bbl/d total Jun 2023: 1,582 bbl/d total Jul 2023: 1,542 bbl/d total Aug 2023: 1,592 bbl/d total Sep 2023: 1,616 bbl/d total Oct 2023: 1,612 bbl/d total Nov 2023: 1,597 bbl/d total Dec 2023: 1,574 bbl/d total Jan 2024: 1,489 bbl/d total Feb 2024: 1,449 bbl/d total Mar 2024: 1,483 bbl/d total Apr 2024: 1,411 bbl/d total May 2024: 1,344 bbl/d total Jun 2024: 1,312 bbl/d total Jul 2024: 1,386 bbl/d total Aug 2024: 1,405 bbl/d total Sep 2024: 1,377 bbl/d total Oct 2024: 1,388 bbl/d total Nov 2024: 1,356 bbl/d total Dec 2024: 1,309 bbl/d total Jan 2025: 1,272 bbl/d total Feb 2025: 1,240 bbl/d total Mar 2025: 1,101 bbl/d total Apr 2025: 932 bbl/d total May 2025: 1,250 bbl/d total Jun 2025: 1,200 bbl/d total Jul 2025: 1,180 bbl/d total Aug 2025: 1,266 bbl/d total Sep 2025: 1,343 bbl/d total Oct 2025: 1,429 bbl/d total Nov 2025: 1,333 bbl/d total Dec 2025: 1,283 bbl/d total Jan 2026: 1,239 bbl/d total Feb 2026: 1,248 bbl/d total Mar 2026: 1,248 bbl/d total Apr 2026: 1,247 bbl/d total May 2026: 1,195 bbl/d total Jun 2026: 997 bbl/d total Jul 2026: ≈1,218 bbl/d total (29% arrived, remainder estimated)

Still arriving: Aug 2026 <1% filed, Sep 2026 <1% filed.

All from what the source published. All held at well grain.

How the volume breaks down
  • 65.8% Reported by the official source by well
  • 34.2% Reported by the official source as a lease total, split across the lease's wells. The regional total shown is the reported number, to rounding.

Every barrel through June 2026 starts from what the official source published for those months. Measured over January 1982 to June 2026.

The bands group wells by when they first produced.

About this chart

The stack shows what is holding today's rate up and how much of it is new drilling. In the reported months the bands draw the filings already in. The months still filling in are marked.

Annual table (full history)

best estimate incl. allocated

YearOil (MMbbl)Gas produced (Bcf)
20250.513
20240.514
20230.615
20220.716
20210.617
20200.417
20190.419
20180.521
20170.523
20160.424
20150.526
20140.628
20130.529
20120.531
20110.434
20100.536
20090.537
20080.539
20070.542
20060.445
20050.547
20040.551
20030.655
20020.661
20010.864
20000.966
19991.069
19981.174
19971.277
19961.271
19951.270
19941.372
19931.478
19921.565
19911.849
19902.135
19892.523
19882.919
19873.418
19863.915
19854.015
19844.618
19835.612
19825.811

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Monthly table (last 24 months)
MonthOil (Mbbl)Gas produced (MMcf)
2026-0629.9981
2026-0537.01,019
2026-0437.4974
2026-0338.71,018
2026-0234.9931
2026-0138.41,010
2025-1239.81,053
2025-1140.01,089
2025-1044.31,067
2025-0940.31,101
2025-0839.21,143
2025-0736.61,112
2025-0636.01,081
2025-0538.71,128
2025-0427.91,033
2025-0334.11,080
2025-0234.7990
2025-0139.41,102
2024-1240.61,128
2024-1140.71,128
2024-1043.01,185
2024-0941.31,152
2024-0843.61,209
2024-0743.01,209

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Source: CommoVision · Otsego County, Michigan, data through July 2026.

Well map

A map of 4,360 well locations in Otsego County, Michigan for which CommoVision holds a published surface coordinate, each drawn where it is and colored by its primary product (green for oil, red for natural gas, gray where undetermined; a spot shared by more than one product shows the one with the most wells there), on a ground of land and water over faint county outlines and place names for orientation, with the drilled wellbore path traced for 14 wells, with a small inset map locating this frame in Michigan.
  • Oil 221
  • Natural gas 3,500
  • Undetermined 639
4,360 well locations in Otsego County, Michigan, colored by primary product. The drilled path is traced for 14 wells from the directional surveys we hold.
About this map

Undetermined means not enough signal to settle it. Producing wells are the ones that reported oil or gas in the 12 months to Jun 2026.

996.6 bbl/d Jun 2026 oil production -17% vs Jun last year
32.7 MMcf/d Jun 2026 gas production -9.2% vs Jun last year best estimate incl. allocated
1,236.1 bbl/d 2025 oil production
35.6 MMcf/d 2025 gas production best estimate incl. allocated
2,827 wells Producing wells tracked 12 months to Jun 2026
30.4 MMcf/d Existing wells, Oct 2027 forecast Our forecast for existing wells.

Type curves

Otsego County, Michigan natural gas type curves (Mcf/d per well, log scale, against months on production; cohorts 2010–2023)
Otsego County, Michigan natural gas type curves: average thousand cubic feet per day per well on a log scale against months on production 2010-2014: 14 wells in curve; starts at 35.9 Mcf/d per well, 0.2 Bcf cumulative through month 156 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 216, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2023: 4 wells in curve; starts at 2.3 Mcf/d per well, 0.0 Bcf cumulative through month 31 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 91, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends1.525102050100Mcf/d24487296120144168192216Months on production
Otsego County, Michigan oil type curves (bbl/d per well, log scale, against months on production; cohorts 2010–2023)
Otsego County, Michigan oil type curves: average barrels per day per well on a log scale against months on production 2010-2014: 14 wells in curve; starts at 27 bbl/d per well, 30.0 Mbbl cumulative through month 156 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 216, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2023: 4 wells in curve; starts at 14.8 bbl/d per well, 7.5 Mbbl cumulative through month 31 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 91, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends0.10.20.5125102040bbl/d24487296120144168192216Months on production

best estimate incl. allocated

Average production per well, for wells grouped by when they first produced.

How these curves are built

Average daily production per well, for wells grouped by when they first produced. Includes every well of the cohort that is old enough at each month. Wells that are shut in or have stopped producing count as zero, so the average reflects the full cohort, not just survivors. Rates are calendar-day (volume ÷ days in month). The cumulative axis accumulates those same monthly averages at the average month length. Months not yet fully reported are excluded. The 2010-2014 curve draws those years as one group. The chart opens on average daily rate against months on production, the rate on a log scale. The view control switches to rate against cumulative production per well, on the same log rate scale, or to cumulative production per well against months on production, on a linear scale. Every view draws the same cohorts from the same production history. Each cohort is solid through the last month all the wells in its curve sit inside fully reported data. Past it the dashed curve carries the same wells forward, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends, for up to five years. A dashed curve runs as far as at least nine in ten of its wells are accounted for. A well that is old enough but shut in still counts, as zero. The measured months are what these wells reported. In the forward months each well counts its own reported figure for each month it has one, our forecast for each month it has only that, and zero for the rest. The forward average counts every well in the curve. The drawn forecast runs up to five years past the measured months. Line thickness tracks the size of each cohort. 158 wells are counted here but not shown on the age axis: they started producing in 1984 or earlier, too close to the start of our records for their region to verify their true age.

Cohort summary table
First produced Wells in curve Peak oil (bbl/d per well) Month-12 oil (bbl/d per well) Cum oil in series (Mbbl per well) Peak gas (Mcf/d per well) Month-12 gas (Mcf/d per well) Cum gas in series (Bcf per well) Months in series Wells old enough at last month in series Forecast months drawn
2023 4 14.8 8 7.5 2.5 2.4 0.0 31 100% 60
2010-2014 14 33.5 33.5 30.0 85 74.5 0.2 156 100% 60

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Source: CommoVision · Otsego County, Michigan type curves, per-well production by first-production cohort.

Top operators in Otsego County, Michigan, 2025 best estimate incl. allocated

  1. Riverside Energy Michigan LLC 29.9%
  2. Muskegon Operating Company LLC 13.3%
  3. V C P Michigan, LLC 11.7%
  4. Lambda Energy Resources LLC 10.3%
  5. Muzyl Oil Corp 3.3%
  6. H R F Antrim LP 2.4%
  7. Core Antrim Company LLC 1.0%
  8. Nuenergy LLC 0.8%
  9. Savoy Energy LP 0.3%
  10. Jordan Development Co LLC 0.3%
  11. 1 other operator 0.1%
  12. Without a named operator 26.7%
Top operators in Otsego County, Michigan, 2025: full table
OperatorOil (Mbbl/d, 2025)Gas produced (MMcf/d, 2025)Share of output
Riverside Energy Michigan LLC 0.016.229.9%
Muskegon Operating Company LLC 0.07.213.3%
V C P Michigan, LLC 0.06.311.7%
Lambda Energy Resources LLC 0.31.110.3%
Muzyl Oil Corp 0.01.83.3%
H R F Antrim LP 0.01.32.4%
Core Antrim Company LLC (July to December) 0.01.11.0%
Nuenergy LLC 0.00.10.8%
Savoy Energy LP 0.00.00.3%
Jordan Development Co LLC 0.00.20.3%
1 other operator 0.00.10.1%
Without a named operator 0.90.926.7%

Mbbl/d = thousand barrels per day · MMcf/d = million cubic feet per day (units).

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Formations

One cross-section across Otsego County, in the Michigan Basin.

Otsego County, Michigan
-5,000-4,000-3,000-2,000-1,0000ft TVDSSColdwater ShaleAntrimTraverse FormationBell ShaleDundeeReed City AnhydriteDetroit RiverRichfieldAmherstburgBois BlancBass IslandsSalina GNiagaran Brown051015SNmiles along the line · dipping 71 ft/mi toward S (182°) · pale ribbon shows how certain each depth is
N3,695 producing wells (thinned)

13 formations along a 16-mile line, south to north.

Every depth drawn here is our own estimate, built from the curated formation tops of Michigan wells across the basin. The pale ribbon along each boundary shows how certain that depth is. Where the ribbon is wider, the depth is less certain.

How these sections are built

The section follows one straight line across the county, and the map beside it shows where that line runs.

West is on the left.

The depth of each formation along the line is estimated from the depths at which Michigan wells across the basin met that formation, as recorded in the official source's per-well formation-top records.

A formation is drawn where enough wells along the line place it and where it stands clear of the formation above or below.

What we cover here

Each row names the grain a region’s production is held at. Where a source publishes at a coarser grain, the page says so.

DataGrainSinceBenchmark
Michigan production well 1980-08 ~100% of EIA

Benchmark cells compare our series with the EIA’s published estimates.

About the EIA comparison

The two are produced differently: the EIA estimates from a survey of the largest operators and a model built to anticipate late filings, while the series compared here are rebuilt from the source’s own records as they arrive. Recent months can differ without either being wrong; the methodology page explains both methods.

Coverage rows for Otsego County, Michigan are regenerated at every build from the same catalog of sources the data is built from.

What the data shows

  • Otsego County, Michigan produced 451 Mbbl (thousand barrels) of oil and 13.0 Bcf of natural gas in 2025.
  • Otsego County, Michigan gas production peaked in 1993 at 78.4 Bcf; 2025 output of 13.0 Bcf ran at 17% of that peak.
  • 2,827 producing wells tracked, 12 months to Jun 2026.

Start a free trial

Watch supply move as soon as its sources publish, with forecasts on 1.1+ million producing wells. The portal is open, with a real API and MCP access for AI tools.

What the trial includes

Data use is subject to our Terms of Service.