CommoVision

See the future in real time

Pittsburg County, Oklahoma

Pittsburg County, Oklahoma produced 6 Mbbl (thousand barrels) of oil and 147.3 Bcf of natural gas in 2025. 2,620 producing wells tracked, 12 months to May 2026.

  • Fifth-largest gas-producing county in Oklahoma, 2025.
  • 5.5% of the natural gas produced in Oklahoma, 2025.
  • Natural gas production rose 3% in 2025 from 2024.
Well map of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma. The full map is further down this page.

Production

Pittsburg County, Oklahoma natural gas production (MMcf/d, monthly average, grouped by when each well first produced)
  • provisional . Months in the hatched zone are partly reported. The part not yet filed is estimated. That estimate draws on our own production forecast. The forecast is provisional. It updates as filings arrive
  • estimated . Hatching marks our estimate. In the most recent months that is volume still to be filed. Past the divider it is our forecast.
Pittsburg County, Oklahoma natural gas production: million cubic feet per day, by first-production vintage filed in full 200400600800 MMcf/d 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026 Oct 2016: 391 MMcf/d total Nov 2016: 591 MMcf/d total Dec 2016: 379 MMcf/d total Jan 2017: 408 MMcf/d total Feb 2017: 407 MMcf/d total Mar 2017: 392 MMcf/d total Apr 2017: 383 MMcf/d total May 2017: 279 MMcf/d total Jun 2017: 391 MMcf/d total Jul 2017: 383 MMcf/d total Aug 2017: 380 MMcf/d total Sep 2017: 403 MMcf/d total Oct 2017: 427 MMcf/d total Nov 2017: 345 MMcf/d total Dec 2017: 436 MMcf/d total Jan 2018: 417 MMcf/d total Feb 2018: 418 MMcf/d total Mar 2018: 414 MMcf/d total Apr 2018: 411 MMcf/d total May 2018: 428 MMcf/d total Jun 2018: 433 MMcf/d total Jul 2018: 437 MMcf/d total Aug 2018: 443 MMcf/d total Sep 2018: 442 MMcf/d total Oct 2018: 443 MMcf/d total Nov 2018: 462 MMcf/d total Dec 2018: 491 MMcf/d total Jan 2019: 627 MMcf/d total Feb 2019: 452 MMcf/d total Mar 2019: 458 MMcf/d total Apr 2019: 474 MMcf/d total May 2019: 484 MMcf/d total Jun 2019: 466 MMcf/d total Jul 2019: 454 MMcf/d total Aug 2019: 323 MMcf/d total Sep 2019: 454 MMcf/d total Oct 2019: 451 MMcf/d total Nov 2019: 438 MMcf/d total Dec 2019: 427 MMcf/d total Jan 2020: 416 MMcf/d total Feb 2020: 391 MMcf/d total Mar 2020: 401 MMcf/d total Apr 2020: 376 MMcf/d total May 2020: 358 MMcf/d total Jun 2020: 345 MMcf/d total Jul 2020: 346 MMcf/d total Aug 2020: 346 MMcf/d total Sep 2020: 339 MMcf/d total Oct 2020: 341 MMcf/d total Nov 2020: 368 MMcf/d total Dec 2020: 356 MMcf/d total Jan 2021: 356 MMcf/d total Feb 2021: 337 MMcf/d total Mar 2021: 359 MMcf/d total Apr 2021: 339 MMcf/d total May 2021: 349 MMcf/d total Jun 2021: 354 MMcf/d total Jul 2021: 353 MMcf/d total Aug 2021: 334 MMcf/d total Sep 2021: 359 MMcf/d total Oct 2021: 341 MMcf/d total Nov 2021: 341 MMcf/d total Dec 2021: 340 MMcf/d total Jan 2022: 351 MMcf/d total Feb 2022: 408 MMcf/d total Mar 2022: 415 MMcf/d total Apr 2022: 401 MMcf/d total May 2022: 425 MMcf/d total Jun 2022: 425 MMcf/d total Jul 2022: 406 MMcf/d total Aug 2022: 472 MMcf/d total Sep 2022: 462 MMcf/d total Oct 2022: 447 MMcf/d total Nov 2022: 496 MMcf/d total Dec 2022: 493 MMcf/d total Jan 2023: 529 MMcf/d total Feb 2023: 497 MMcf/d total Mar 2023: 478 MMcf/d total Apr 2023: 462 MMcf/d total May 2023: 443 MMcf/d total Jun 2023: 430 MMcf/d total Jul 2023: 424 MMcf/d total Aug 2023: 421 MMcf/d total Sep 2023: 440 MMcf/d total Oct 2023: 431 MMcf/d total Nov 2023: 455 MMcf/d total Dec 2023: 451 MMcf/d total Jan 2024: 420 MMcf/d total Feb 2024: 410 MMcf/d total Mar 2024: 383 MMcf/d total Apr 2024: 395 MMcf/d total May 2024: 424 MMcf/d total Jun 2024: 419 MMcf/d total Jul 2024: 414 MMcf/d total Aug 2024: 398 MMcf/d total Sep 2024: 388 MMcf/d total Oct 2024: 382 MMcf/d total Nov 2024: 355 MMcf/d total Dec 2024: 294 MMcf/d total Jan 2025: 330 MMcf/d total Feb 2025: 480 MMcf/d total Mar 2025: 456 MMcf/d total Apr 2025: 445 MMcf/d total May 2025: 363 MMcf/d total Jun 2025: 357 MMcf/d total Jul 2025: 354 MMcf/d total Aug 2025: 363 MMcf/d total Sep 2025: 433 MMcf/d total Oct 2025: 436 MMcf/d total Nov 2025: 392 MMcf/d total Dec 2025: 443 MMcf/d total Jan 2026: 443 MMcf/d total Feb 2026: 453 MMcf/d total Mar 2026: 443 MMcf/d total Apr 2026: 390 MMcf/d total May 2026: 419 MMcf/d total Jun 2026: ≈411 MMcf/d total (4% arrived, remainder estimated) Jul 2026: ≈402 MMcf/d total (<1% arrived, remainder estimated) Aug 2026: ≈393 MMcf/d total (<1% arrived, remainder estimated) Sep 2026: ≈380 MMcf/d total (<1% arrived, remainder estimated)

In this view, hatching marks our estimate, and in the most recent months that is volume still to be filed. Past the divider, the chart continues only the bands it has drawn. Each band continues as our forecast, built by summing our per-well forecasts. The method behind each well is recorded with the forecast. The forward months add no new wells. How our methods work

All from what the source published. All held at well grain.

How the volume breaks down
  • 31.8% Reported by the official source by well
  • 68.2% Reported by the official source as a lease total, split across the lease's wells. The regional total shown is the reported number, to rounding.

Every cubic foot through May 2026 starts from what the official source published for those months. Measured over January 1990 to May 2026.

Pittsburg County, Oklahoma oil production (bbl/d, monthly average, grouped by when each well first produced)
Pittsburg County, Oklahoma oil production: barrels per day, by first-production vintage today 100200300400 bbl/d 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026 Jun 2016: 0 bbl/d total Jul 2016: 0 bbl/d total Aug 2016: 0 bbl/d total Sep 2016: 0 bbl/d total Oct 2016: 5.36 bbl/d total Nov 2016: 0 bbl/d total Dec 2016: 0 bbl/d total Jan 2017: 0 bbl/d total Feb 2017: 0 bbl/d total Mar 2017: 11.5 bbl/d total Apr 2017: 0 bbl/d total May 2017: 0 bbl/d total Jun 2017: 0 bbl/d total Jul 2017: 0 bbl/d total Aug 2017: 0 bbl/d total Sep 2017: 5.4 bbl/d total Oct 2017: 0 bbl/d total Nov 2017: 0 bbl/d total Dec 2017: 0 bbl/d total Jan 2018: 0 bbl/d total Feb 2018: 0 bbl/d total Mar 2018: 0 bbl/d total Apr 2018: 53.4 bbl/d total May 2018: 188 bbl/d total Jun 2018: 124 bbl/d total Jul 2018: 115 bbl/d total Aug 2018: 102 bbl/d total Sep 2018: 70.6 bbl/d total Oct 2018: 49.5 bbl/d total Nov 2018: 11.7 bbl/d total Dec 2018: 35.2 bbl/d total Jan 2019: 82.3 bbl/d total Feb 2019: 40.8 bbl/d total Mar 2019: 39.5 bbl/d total Apr 2019: 17.4 bbl/d total May 2019: 62.7 bbl/d total Jun 2019: 38.8 bbl/d total Jul 2019: 37.9 bbl/d total Aug 2019: 35.9 bbl/d total Sep 2019: 38.4 bbl/d total Oct 2019: 36.3 bbl/d total Nov 2019: 198 bbl/d total Dec 2019: 40.9 bbl/d total Jan 2020: 39.7 bbl/d total Feb 2020: 22.4 bbl/d total Mar 2020: 33.8 bbl/d total Apr 2020: 21.2 bbl/d total May 2020: 15 bbl/d total Jun 2020: 15.3 bbl/d total Jul 2020: 15.1 bbl/d total Aug 2020: 17.4 bbl/d total Sep 2020: 23.5 bbl/d total Oct 2020: 38.8 bbl/d total Nov 2020: 30 bbl/d total Dec 2020: 30.6 bbl/d total Jan 2021: 35.4 bbl/d total Feb 2021: 25.2 bbl/d total Mar 2021: 34.3 bbl/d total Apr 2021: 37.1 bbl/d total May 2021: 24.6 bbl/d total Jun 2021: 30.8 bbl/d total Jul 2021: 28.1 bbl/d total Aug 2021: 20.2 bbl/d total Sep 2021: 27.2 bbl/d total Oct 2021: 27.7 bbl/d total Nov 2021: 32.8 bbl/d total Dec 2021: 336 bbl/d total Jan 2022: 26.9 bbl/d total Feb 2022: 35.3 bbl/d total Mar 2022: 28.5 bbl/d total Apr 2022: 24.5 bbl/d total May 2022: 17.3 bbl/d total Jun 2022: 23.6 bbl/d total Jul 2022: 30.2 bbl/d total Aug 2022: 22.5 bbl/d total Sep 2022: 27.2 bbl/d total Oct 2022: 26.5 bbl/d total Nov 2022: 30.4 bbl/d total Dec 2022: 22.1 bbl/d total Jan 2023: 20.5 bbl/d total Feb 2023: 18.6 bbl/d total Mar 2023: 24.2 bbl/d total Apr 2023: 20.7 bbl/d total May 2023: 27.9 bbl/d total Jun 2023: 25.4 bbl/d total Jul 2023: 21.6 bbl/d total Aug 2023: 13.3 bbl/d total Sep 2023: 28.1 bbl/d total Oct 2023: 22 bbl/d total Nov 2023: 19.9 bbl/d total Dec 2023: 13.3 bbl/d total Jan 2024: 20.3 bbl/d total Feb 2024: 10.5 bbl/d total Mar 2024: 20.6 bbl/d total Apr 2024: 20 bbl/d total May 2024: 19.7 bbl/d total Jun 2024: 17.4 bbl/d total Jul 2024: 17.5 bbl/d total Aug 2024: 19.5 bbl/d total Sep 2024: 22.9 bbl/d total Oct 2024: 6.42 bbl/d total Nov 2024: 26 bbl/d total Dec 2024: 21.8 bbl/d total Jan 2025: 13.7 bbl/d total Feb 2025: 36.3 bbl/d total Mar 2025: 14.5 bbl/d total Apr 2025: 20.8 bbl/d total May 2025: 13.2 bbl/d total Jun 2025: 17.1 bbl/d total Jul 2025: 13 bbl/d total Aug 2025: 12.8 bbl/d total Sep 2025: 12.1 bbl/d total Oct 2025: 11.1 bbl/d total Nov 2025: 13.5 bbl/d total Dec 2025: 11.2 bbl/d total Jan 2026: 11.4 bbl/d total Feb 2026: 10.5 bbl/d total Mar 2026: 16.4 bbl/d total Apr 2026: 12 bbl/d total May 2026: 13.2 bbl/d total

Still arriving: Jun 2026 4% filed, Jul 2026 <1% filed, Aug 2026 <1% filed.

All from what the source published. All held at well grain.

How the volume breaks down
  • 29.0% Reported by the official source by well
  • 71.0% Reported by the official source as a lease total, split across the lease's wells. The regional total shown is the reported number, to rounding.

Every barrel through May 2026 starts from what the official source published for those months. Measured over January 1990 to May 2026.

The bands group wells by when they first produced.

About this chart

The stack shows what is holding today's rate up and how much of it is new drilling. In the reported months the bands draw the filings already in. The months still filling in are marked.

Annual table (full history)

best estimate incl. allocated

YearOil (MMbbl)Gas produced (Bcf)
2025<0.1147
2024<0.1143
2023<0.1166
2022<0.1158
2021<0.1127
2020<0.1134
2019<0.1168
2018<0.1159
2017<0.1141
2016<0.1143
2015<0.1122
2014<0.1142
2013<0.1175
2012<0.1179
2011<0.1171
2010<0.1144
2009<0.1124
2008<0.1106
2007<0.180
2006<0.176
2005<0.167
2004<0.166
2003<0.158
20020.053
2001<0.155
20000.049
19990.053
19980.059
19970.058
1996<0.159
19950.057
1994<0.159
1993<0.164
19920.067
19910.071
19900.037

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Monthly table (last 24 months)
MonthOil (Mbbl)Gas produced (MMcf)
2026-050.412,982
2026-040.411,710
2026-030.513,736
2026-020.312,686
2026-010.413,724
2025-120.313,723
2025-110.411,768
2025-100.313,524
2025-090.412,978
2025-080.411,261
2025-070.410,963
2025-060.510,722
2025-050.411,258
2025-040.613,363
2025-030.414,138
2025-021.013,428
2025-010.410,217
2024-120.79,099
2024-110.810,654
2024-100.211,852
2024-090.711,642
2024-080.612,349
2024-070.512,828
2024-060.512,560

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Source: CommoVision · Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, data through June 2026.

Well map

A map of 5,413 well locations in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma for which CommoVision holds a published surface coordinate, each drawn where it is and colored by its primary product (green for oil, red for natural gas, gray where undetermined; a spot shared by more than one product shows the one with the most wells there), on a ground of land and water over faint county outlines and place names for orientation, with the drilled wellbore path traced for 1,602 wells, with a small inset map locating this frame in Oklahoma.
  • Oil 18
  • Natural gas 5,257
  • Undetermined 138
5,413 well locations in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, colored by primary product. The drilled path is traced for 1,602 wells from the directional surveys we hold.
About this map

Undetermined means not enough signal to settle it. Producing wells are the ones that reported oil or gas in the 12 months to May 2026.

13.2 bbl/d May 2026 oil production 0% vs May last year best estimate incl. allocated
418.8 MMcf/d May 2026 gas production +15.3% vs May last year best estimate incl. allocated
15.6 bbl/d 2025 oil production best estimate incl. allocated
403.7 MMcf/d 2025 gas production best estimate incl. allocated
2,620 wells Producing wells tracked 12 months to May 2026
296.4 MMcf/d Existing wells, Sep 2027 forecast Our forecast for existing wells.

Type curves

Pittsburg County, Oklahoma natural gas type curves (Mcf/d per well, log scale, against months on production; cohorts 2010–2026)
Pittsburg County, Oklahoma natural gas type curves: average thousand cubic feet per day per well on a log scale against months on production 2010-2014: 381 wells; starts at 1,019 Mcf/d per well, 1.7 Bcf cumulative through month 139 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 199, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2015: 39 wells; starts at 1,410 Mcf/d per well, 3.6 Bcf cumulative through month 126 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 186, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2016: 16 wells; starts at 1,600 Mcf/d per well, 5.6 Bcf cumulative through month 114 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 174, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2017: 16 wells; starts at 2,009 Mcf/d per well, 4.2 Bcf cumulative through month 103 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 163, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2018: 25 wells; starts at 2,860 Mcf/d per well, 4.5 Bcf cumulative through month 90 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 150, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2019: 29 wells; starts at 1,207 Mcf/d per well, 2.2 Bcf cumulative through month 79 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 139, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2020: 6 wells; starts at 182 Mcf/d per well, 3.5 Bcf cumulative through month 68 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 128, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2021: 9 wells; starts at 400 Mcf/d per well, 1.7 Bcf cumulative through month 55 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 115, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2022: 41 wells; starts at 2,108 Mcf/d per well, 2.5 Bcf cumulative through month 42 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 102, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2023: 10 wells; starts at 3,568 Mcf/d per well, 3.0 Bcf cumulative through month 30 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 90, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2024: 8 wells; starts at 1,441 Mcf/d per well, 2.4 Bcf cumulative through month 18 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 78, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2025: 20 wells; starts at 1,499 Mcf/d per well, 0.8 Bcf cumulative through month 7 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 67, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2026: 3 wells; starts at 1,168 Mcf/d per well, 0.3 Bcf cumulative through month 2 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 62, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends1002005001,0002,0005,00010,000Mcf/d24487296120144168192216Months on production
Pittsburg County, Oklahoma oil type curves (bbl/d per well, log scale, against months on production; cohorts 2010–2022)
Pittsburg County, Oklahoma oil type curves: average barrels per day per well on a log scale against months on production 2010-2014: 381 wells; starts at 0.6 bbl/d per well, 0.0 Mbbl cumulative through month 120 (100% of its wells old enough at that month)2018: 25 wells; starts at 1.9 bbl/d per well, 2.8 Mbbl cumulative through month 90 (100% of its wells old enough at that month); the dashed curve runs through month 150, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends2022: 41 wells; starts at 0.1 bbl/d per well, 0.0 Mbbl cumulative through month 5 (100% of its wells old enough at that month)0.10.20.512510bbl/d24487296120144168Months on production

best estimate incl. allocated

Horizontal wells only. Average production per well, for wells grouped by when they first produced.

How these curves are built

Horizontal wells only: 603 of the 658 wells in these cohorts. Average daily production per well, drawn against the cohort’s cumulative production per well on a log rate scale, for wells grouped by when they first produced. Includes every well of the cohort that is old enough at each month. Wells that are shut in or have stopped producing count as zero, so the average reflects the full cohort, not just survivors. Rates are calendar-day (volume ÷ days in month). The cumulative axis accumulates those same monthly averages at the average month length. Months not yet fully reported are excluded. The 2010-2014 curve draws those years as one group. The chart opens on average daily rate against months on production; the view control switches to rate against cumulative production per well (the log-rate form described above) or to cumulative production per well against months. Every view draws the same cohorts from the same production history. Each cohort with a dashed curve is solid through the last month all of its wells sit inside fully reported data. Past it the dashed curve carries the same wells forward, on our forecast where a well’s own record ends, for up to five years. A dashed curve runs as far as at least nine in ten of its wells are accounted for. A cohort with no dashed curve is drawn only through the months where at least 30% of its wells are old enough for the month to be fully reported. A well that is old enough but shut in still counts, as zero. The measured months are what these wells reported. In the forward months each well counts its own reported figure for each month it has one, our forecast for each month it has only that, and zero for the rest. The forward average counts every well of the cohort. The drawn forecast runs up to five years past the measured months. Line thickness tracks how many wells each curve is drawn from. 4 wells are counted here but not shown on the age axis: they started producing in 1992 or earlier, too close to the start of our records for their region to verify their true age.

Cohort summary table
First produced Wells Peak oil (bbl/d per well) Month-12 oil (bbl/d per well) Cum oil in series (Mbbl per well) Peak gas (Mcf/d per well) Month-12 gas (Mcf/d per well) Cum gas in series (Bcf per well) Months in series Wells old enough at last month in series Forecast months drawn
2026 3 0 0.0 7,253 0.3 2 100% 60
2025 20 0 0 0.0 5,369 0.8 16 35% 60
2024 8 0 0 0.0 7,682 2,999 2.4 25 38% 60
2023 10 0 0 0.0 6,957 3,502 3.0 34 40% 60
2022 41 0.2 0 0.0 5,381 2,409 2.5 49 32% 60
2021 9 0 0 0.0 2,149 1,005 1.7 55 100% 60
2020 6 0 0 0.0 3,480 1,334 3.5 68 100% 60
2019 29 0 0 0.0 3,059 1,249 2.2 84 41% 60
2018 25 7.3 1.4 2.8 5,587 3,352 4.5 90 100% 60
2017 16 0 0 0.0 4,307 2,667 4.2 105 75% 60
2016 16 0 0 0.0 5,580 3,620 5.6 123 31% 60
2015 39 0 0 0.0 3,728 2,606 3.6 132 36% 60
2010-2014 381 0.6 0 0.0 1,581 876 1.7 186 31% 60

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

Source: CommoVision · Pittsburg County, Oklahoma type curves, per-well production by first-production cohort.

Top operators in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, 2025 best estimate incl. allocated

  1. Nextera Energy Marketing 23.2%
  2. Calyx Energy 17.6%
  3. Sanguine Gas Exploration 15.6%
  4. Merit Energy Company 13.4%
  5. Trinity Operating (USG) 8.1%
  6. ExxonMobil 6.8%
  7. Mustang Fuel Corporation 2.5%
  8. Marabou Midstream Services 2.2%
  9. Southwest Energy 1.5%
  10. BRG Petroleum 1.3%
  11. 61 other operators 8.0%
Top operators in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, 2025: full table
OperatorOil (Mbbl/d, 2025)Gas produced (MMcf/d, 2025)Share of output
Nextera Energy Marketing 0.093.723.2%
Calyx Energy 0.071.217.6%
Sanguine Gas Exploration 0.063.015.6%
Merit Energy Company 0.053.713.4%
Trinity Operating (USG) 0.032.68.1%
ExxonMobil 0.027.56.8%
Mustang Fuel Corporation 0.09.92.5%
Marabou Midstream Services 0.08.82.2%
Southwest Energy 0.05.91.5%
BRG Petroleum 0.05.11.3%
61 other operators 0.032.28.0%

Mbbl/d = thousand barrels per day · MMcf/d = million cubic feet per day (units).

Source: CommoVision (commovision.com)

What we cover here

Each row names the grain a region’s production is held at. Where a source publishes at a coarser grain, the page says so.

DataGrainSinceBenchmark
Oklahoma production lease + well 1990-07 ~99–100% of EIA

Benchmark cells compare our series with the EIA’s published estimates.

About the EIA comparison

The two are produced differently: the EIA estimates from a survey of the largest operators and a model built to anticipate late filings, while the series compared here are rebuilt from the source’s own records as they arrive. Recent months can differ without either being wrong; the methodology page explains both methods.

Coverage rows for Pittsburg County, Oklahoma are regenerated at every build from the same catalog of sources the data is built from.

What the data shows

  • Pittsburg County, Oklahoma produced 6 Mbbl (thousand barrels) of oil and 147.3 Bcf of natural gas in 2025.
  • Pittsburg County, Oklahoma gas production peaked in 2012 at 178.6 Bcf; 2025 output of 147.3 Bcf ran at 82% of that peak.
  • A county page carries the production attributed to wells in that county. Oklahoma also publishes production that is held at lease grain, and that sits on the Oklahoma state page. In 2025 it was 8.4% of the state's oil and 3.8% of its gas.
  • 2,620 producing wells tracked, 12 months to May 2026.

Get early access

Watch supply move as soon as its sources publish, with forecasts on 1.1+ million producing wells. The portal, an API and MCP access for AI tools open on October 1, 2026.

Data use is subject to our Terms of Service.